APPROVED CLAIM CONSISTENCY
Keep one approved selling point across four panels
Confirm the three required brief inputs—product name, audience context, and one verbatim approved selling point. Appearance description or a reference image is optional. Use that selling point as the only claim source at all four positions in the complete image. The beats are not separate assets or interactive regions; a person checks them by position, then approves the whole image.
APPROVED CLAIM CONSISTENCY
Verbatim approved selling point
Paste one complete selling point already confirmed by the team, including required qualifiers. It is the only claim source used at all four positions in the complete image and is not rewritten in pre-generation beat prompt material.
APPROVED CLAIM CONSISTENCY
Prohibited wording
Record benefits, results, comparisons, absolutes, and qualifier-free variants that must not appear. Return the draft for an edit when text or a visual implication matches any entry.
APPROVED CLAIM CONSISTENCY
Beat prompt material constrains presentation, not the selling point
Visible copy may be shortened or omitted for a beat position, but it can express only the same approved selling point. An override is prompt material before generation, not a separate image editor or interactive region, and it is not a second claim input.Image position 1
At position 1, open with the context or problem. If the selling point appears, use its approved wording or an excerpt that keeps every required qualifier.
Image position 2
At position 2, continue the same use context without adding a stronger benefit, a comparison target, or a result to the source wording.
Image position 3
At position 3, show the product with the same selling point, then check whether the depicted action implies a prohibited result or wider use.
Image position 4
At position 4, close the story with action copy while keeping the CTA free of extra product claims, authority signals, or promises.
APPROVED CLAIM CONSISTENCY
Prohibited-wording control covers text and visual implications
Check beat overrides and the complete resulting image against the same prohibited-wording list. A person edits the prompt material or returns the whole draft when an entry is matched.Prohibited-wording control covers text and visual implications
- Check exact prohibited terms and variants created by dropping a qualifier.
- Check paraphrases, comparisons, absolutes, and newly introduced results.
- Treat character reactions, before-and-after contrasts, and exaggerated visuals as possible claims.
- Leave a matched panel unresolved; safe wording in another panel does not cancel it.
Run this narrow claim-consistency check before export
This human check answers only whether the four-panel selling point remains inside its approved boundary. The separate human-review guide owns the full review and explicit-approval steps.
- Compare the visible words and visual promise at all four image positions with the verbatim approved selling point.
- Confirm no panel introduces a second selling point or removes a required qualifier.
- Scan every beat override and the final complete image against all prohibited wording again.
- After any relevant copy or visual change, repeat this check before the full human gate decides whether to approve export.
APPROVED CLAIM CONSISTENCY
Operational boundary
This method helps a team find wording drift between panels. It does not decide product facts, claim substantiation, or publication requirements for the team.- It does not provide legal advice or decide whether a selling point may be published in a particular region or channel.
- It does not mean any platform has accepted, reviewed, or approved the creative in advance.
- It does not predict views, clicks, conversion, sales, ranking, or any other performance.
APPROVED CLAIM CONSISTENCY